The Social Life of Health Information, 2011

Social Media in Context

Relatively few use hospital ranking and doctor review sites.

Hospital and doctor review sites have not yet become health care decision-making tools for most consumers. One national survey found that only 6% of American adults are aware of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid’s Hospital Compare tool.6 Our current survey finds a similarly low usage of such sites among adult internet users, matching trends we first reported in 2009.7

  • 16% of internet users have consulted online rankings or reviews of doctors or other providers.
  • 15% of internet users have consulted online rankings or reviews of hospitals or other medical facilities.
  • 4% of internet users have posted a review online of a doctor.
  • 3% of internet users have posted a review online of a hospital.

Again, caregivers are more likely than other groups to engage in these activities. For example, 21% of online caregivers consult online doctor reviews, compared with 13% of internet users not currently caring for a loved one. Twenty percent of online caregivers consult online hospital reviews, compared with 12% of other internet users.

Eighteen percent of internet users living with one or more chronic conditions have looked online for doctor rankings or reviews, compared with 14% of internet users who report no conditions. Six percent of internet users living with chronic disease have posted such a review, compared with 3% of those who report no conditions. Both of those differences are statistically significant, but more importantly, they are significant because of the context of who is most likely to be a frequent health care consumer: someone living with a chronic condition.

Internet users living with disability do not report a higher or lower likelihood to consult hospital rankings and doctor reviews. However, they are more likely than other internet users to post reviews of doctors and other health professionals online: 8% do so, compared with 4% of those who report no disability.

Notes

6 Tara Lagu and Peter K. Lindenauer, “Putting the Public Back in Public Reporting of Health Care Quality.” (Journal of the American Medical Association: 2010;304(15):1711-1712.) See: http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/304/15/1711.extract

7 The Social Life of Health Information, 2009. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx

Pew Internet Logo

Copyright 2012 Pew Internet & American Life Project

The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project is one of seven projects that make up the Pew Research Center. The Center is supported by The Pew Charitable Trust.